dc.contributor.author | Svensson, Sophie | |
dc.contributor.author | Sällergård, Ida | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-17T15:32:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-01-17T15:32:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-01-17 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/54986 | |
dc.description.abstract | The Swedish labour market has gone through some drastic changes the last couple of decades.
New working conditions and new types of professions have appeared, which puts a lot of
pressure on the occupational safety and health. The purpose of this study is to look into how
the union representatives, at a regional level, work with organizational and social work
environment. The study examines the new regulation AFS 2015:4 Organisatorisk och social
arbetsmiljö (organizational and social work environment) and what opportunities and
limitations it can offer to the union representatives for their influence in questions regarding
occupational safety and health. We also look to compare and contrast the differences between
the public and private sector in terms of the conditions of work environment. Previous research in the field of this study is very limited since the regulation AFS 2015:4 is
almost brand new. Therefore we started with examining how previous regulations such as
SAM 2001:1 Systematiskt arbetsmiljöarbete (systematic work environment) has been
received by the parties in the Swedish labour market. The complexity of the work
environment has also been accounted for in the section of previous research. The theoretical
framework used in this study builds on institutional theory, institutional work, the travel of
ideas and the dichotomy stability and change. The study has a qualitative approach based on
eleven semi-structured interviews with union representatives operating on a regional level.
Five of the respondents work against the public sector (organization A) and six operates in the
private sector (organization B).
The results of the study indicate that there are differences between sectors in how the union
representatives at a regional level work with organizational and social work environment. The
organizational stability and structure differs between the public and private sector, which
affect the union representatives influence in the labour market regarding the occupational
safety and health. The union representatives in both sectors feel that organizational and social
work environment is a very complex phenomenon to work with. Nevertheless they feel that
the new regulation AFS 2015:4 facilitates and increases their influence towards the employers
in the labour market. | sv |
dc.language.iso | swe | sv |
dc.subject | work environment | sv |
dc.subject | trade union | sv |
dc.subject | change | sv |
dc.subject | influence | sv |
dc.subject | structure | sv |
dc.title | AFS 2015:4 – möjligheter och begränsningar i regionala fackliga ombudsmäns arbete med organisatorisk och social arbetsmiljö - en jämföresle mellan två fackförbund | sv |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.setspec.uppsok | SocialBehaviourLaw | |
dc.type.uppsok | M2 | |
dc.contributor.department | University of Gothenburg / Department of sociology and work science | eng |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborgs universitet / / Institutionen för sociologi och arbetsvetenskap | swe |
dc.type.degree | Student essay | |