• English
    • svenska
  • English 
    • English
    • svenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Social Science / Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten
  • Department of Political Science / Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
  • Working Papers/Books /Department of Political Science / Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Social Science / Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten
  • Department of Political Science / Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
  • Working Papers/Books /Department of Political Science / Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Self-Censorship in Authoritarian States: Response bias in measures of popular support in China

Abstract
The study of popular support for authoritarian regimes, and the comparative study of political attitudes, has long relied on the assumption that survey respondents provide truthful answers on surveys. However, when measuring regime support in closed political systems there is a distinct risk that individuals are less than forthright due to fear that their opinions may be made known to the public or the authorities. In order to test this assumption, we conducted a novel web-based survey in China in which we included four list experiments of commonly used items in the comparative literature on regime support. We find systematic bias for all four measures as a result of selfcensorship; substantially more individuals state that they support the regime with direct questioning than do when presented with our anonymous, indirect list experiments. The level of self-censorship, which ranges from 16 to 22 percentage points, is considerably higher than previously thought. Selfcensorship is further most prevalent among the wealthy, urban, female and younger respondents. These findings indicate that prior studies that have found high levels of support for the Chinese regime using these particular measures likely overestimate the true level of support. Further, crossnational studies which compare popular support across regime type may be systematically biased if responses are not subject to the same level of falsification across regime types.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/2077/56175
Collections
  • Working Papers/Books /Department of Political Science / Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
View/Open
gupea_2077_56175_1.pdf (1.005Mb)
Date
2018
Author
Robinson, Darrel
Tannenberg, Marcus
Series/Report no.
Working Papers
2018:66
Language
eng
Metadata
Show full item record

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV