dc.contributor.author | Misurák, Sebastian | |
dc.contributor.author | Steen, Philip | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-06T12:18:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-06T12:18:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-07-06 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/57053 | |
dc.description | MSc in Knowledge-based Entrepreneurship | sv |
dc.description.abstract | Background and Problem Formulation: Since 2012 there has been a steady increase of
corporate venture capital (CVC) activity in The Silicon Valley. In 2017 more than 20 % of the
total venture capital investment was made by corporate actors. As opposed to their independent
venture capital (IVC) counterparts, corporate investors often have strategic incentives for
investing, as they try to further their business model and acquire knowledge. Almost all venture
capital investments happen through syndication, meaning that independent venture capital firms
and corporate venture capital arms end up collaborating despite their differences.
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the relationship between IVCs and CVCs as they invest
alongside each other. More specifically it looks at how IVCs evaluate CVCs as syndicate
partners.
Limitations and Delimitations: This study has solely focused on the venture capital ecosystem
in the San Francisco Bay Area (The Silicon Valley). Furthermore, the study has only approached
the problem from the point of view of the independent venture capital firms. Only 10 firms were
interviewed, making the study less generalizable than what would have been the case had
interviews of a greater number been conducted. Furthermore, while most of the firms that have
partaken in this study are within tech, some are investing within health sciences, however, no
distinction between these have been made.
Methodology: This is a multiple case study. Ten semi-structured interviews have been
conducted with general partners at ten separate IVCs. Before conducting the interviews an
interview guide was created to be used as a tool to keep the interviews within the designated
topic. Once conducted, the interviews were transcribed and subsequently broken down with the
use of thematic analysis.
Results and Conclusion: The study shows that IVCs value predictability with their potential
CVC syndicate partners higher than anything else. This entails being certain (to the greatest
extent possible) that no strategic shifts within a corporation will lead to swift short term shifts of
the corporation’s venture arm’s investment thesis. However, once predictability is guaranteed
any potential value-added capabilities that the CVC might possess can be considered. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Master Degree Project | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2018:175 | sv |
dc.subject | Venture Capital | sv |
dc.subject | Corporate Venture Capital | sv |
dc.subject | Independent Venture Capital | sv |
dc.subject | Syndicate | sv |
dc.subject | Predictability | sv |
dc.subject | Value-added Capabilities | sv |
dc.subject | Agency Theory | sv |
dc.subject | Resource-Based View | sv |
dc.title | Mixed Venture Capital Syndicates: How Independent Venture Capital Firms Evaluate Corporate Venture Capital Arms as Syndication Partners | sv |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.setspec.uppsok | SocialBehaviourLaw | |
dc.type.uppsok | H2 | |
dc.contributor.department | University of Gothenburg/Graduate School | eng |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborgs universitet/Graduate School | swe |
dc.type.degree | Master 2-years | |