Essays on behavioral determinants of earnings quality
Abstract
The neoclassical economic view of the firm - upon which most of the empirical financial accounting research is based - assumes that managers are rational wealth optimizers. Therefore, managers are considered homogeneous and selfless inputs into the production process, and this implies that different managers are perfect substitutes for one another. Although managers
might have differences regarding their preferences, risk profiles, and skills, neoclassical economic theory assumes that none of these individual characteristics reflects upon actual corporate policies; the implication here is that individual managers are not able to influence corporate decisions through managerial discretion. On the other hand, upper echelons theory suggests that individual managers do matter when it comes to corporate decisions and outputs, and that top executives' experiences, values, and personality influence their subjective interpretations of the situations they face, and thus affect their decisions. Based on the assumptions inherent in upper echelons theory, this Ph.D. dissertation investigates
the potential effect of top executives' personal characteristics on financial reporting decision-making; in particular, it focuses on those of chief executive officers (CEOs) and chief financial
officers (CFOs). The underlying objective of the dissertation is to determine whether the
individual-level characteristics of CEOs and CFOs explain earnings quality in firms. Additionally,
this dissertation also considers the economic characteristics of users of financial information
as determinants of earnings quality.
The empirical findings of the studies carried out within the scope of this dissertation show that
managerial characteristics indeed explain earnings quality. Specifically, CEO marital status and
the gender of a CEO's first-born child are found to significantly determine accruals quality -
and by implication, earnings quality - among firms. Likewise, CEO personality traits such as
hubris are also significant determinants of accruals (i.e., loan loss provisions) quality in banks. Meanwhile, CFO gender has been found to influence earnings quality in terms of the usefulness to investors of earnings information. Finally, the results indicate that the economic characteristics of users of financial information also determine the usefulness of earnings.
Parts of work
1. The relative importance of conditional conservatism for bond and equity investors - Savvas Papadopoulos and Jan Marton 2. What determines bank loan loss provisions quality? A study of CEO hubris - Savvas Papadopoulos 3. Accruals quality: Does CEO marital status really matter? - Savvas Papadopoulos 4. Trust beyond numbers: CFO gender as a moderator of investors' information risk - Savvas Papadopoulos
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
University
Göteborgs universitet. Handelshögskolan
Institution
Department of Business Administration ; Företagsekonomiska institutionen
Disputation
fredagen den 1 februari 2019, kl. 13.15, SEB-salen, Handelshögskolan, Vasagatan 1, Göteborg
Date of defence
2019-02-01
savvas.papadopoulos@handels.gu.se
Date
2018-12-20Author
Papadopoulos, Savvas
Keywords
managerial characteristics
CEOs
CFOs
earnings quality
accruals quality
loan loss provisions
bond markets
equity markets
earnings announcement
risk
Publication type
Doctoral thesis
ISBN
978-91-88623-09-6
Language
eng