Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStephenson, Matthew C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-09T12:24:22Z
dc.date.available2019-08-09T12:24:22Z
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.identifier.issn1653-8919
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/61453
dc.description.abstractCorruption is widely believed to be a self-reinforcing phenomenon, in the sense that the incentive to engage in corrupt acts increases as corruption becomes more widespread in the relevant community. Leading scholars have argued that corruption’s self-reinforcing property implies that incremental anticorruption reforms cannot be effective, and that the only way to escape a high-corruption equilibrium “trap” is through a so-called “big bang” or “big push.” This widespread view is mistaken. After surveying the reasons corruption might be self-reinforcing (or in some cases self-limiting), this paper demonstrates that corruption’s self-reinforcing property does not imply the necessity of a “big bang” approach to reform, and indeed may strengthen the case for pursuing sustained, cumulative incremental anticorruption reforms.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paperssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries2019:10sv
dc.relation.urihttps://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1737/1737653_2019_10_stephenson.pdfsv
dc.titleCorruption as a Self-Reinforcing “Trap”: Implications for Reform Strategysv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.sveparticle, other scientificsv
dc.contributor.organizationQoG Institutesv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record