dc.contributor.author | Jacobson, Lars E.O | |
dc.contributor.author | Berneblad, Philip | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-28T12:57:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-28T12:57:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-05-28 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/64564 | |
dc.description | MSc in Finance | sv |
dc.description.abstract | This paper tests the pecking order theory of corporate leverage on a representative sample of
publicly traded European firms, between 2006 and 2018, and further investigates differences
between financing deficits and surpluses as well as differences between sectors. Similar research
in the area does not find evidence supporting the pecking order theory for publicly traded
American firms. The pecking order theory is rejected when testing European firms but shows
a significant difference between financing deficits and financing surpluses as well as differences
between sectors. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Master Degree Project | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2019:155 | sv |
dc.subject | Pecking Order Theory | sv |
dc.subject | Financing Deficit | sv |
dc.subject | Financing Surplus | sv |
dc.subject | Capital Structure | sv |
dc.subject | Corporate Leverage | sv |
dc.title | Test of Pecking Order Theory - Empirical evidence from Europe | sv |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.setspec.uppsok | SocialBehaviourLaw | |
dc.type.uppsok | H2 | |
dc.contributor.department | University of Gothenburg/Graduate School | eng |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborgs universitet/Graduate School | swe |
dc.type.degree | Master 2-years | |