dc.contributor.author | Svensson, Lotten | |
dc.contributor.author | von Nordenskjöld, Catharina | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-01T12:27:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-01T12:27:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-07-01 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/65403 | |
dc.description | MSc in Accounting and Financial Management | sv |
dc.description.abstract | We have performed a single case study of the public consultation process of an
accounting standard with major financial implications, making it prone to induce
intense lobbying. We studied the ability of the standard setting board, the IASB,
to remain independent, i.e. not unduly affected, by either a stakeholder group
or a certain type of comment. Our findings do not suggest any disproportionate
stakeholder influence, nor any disproportionate favoring of a certain type of argument.
This predominantly is aligned with previous literature. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Master Degree Project | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2020:44 | sv |
dc.subject | Influence | sv |
dc.subject | IFRS 16 | sv |
dc.subject | Accounting regulation | sv |
dc.subject | Accounting standard | sv |
dc.subject | IFRS | sv |
dc.subject | IASB | sv |
dc.subject | CIG | sv |
dc.title | THE POLITICAL PROCESS OF STANDARD-SETTING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FINAL STANDARD - An examination of stakeholder influence in the due process of IFRS 16 Leases | sv |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.setspec.uppsok | SocialBehaviourLaw | |
dc.type.uppsok | H2 | |
dc.contributor.department | University of Gothenburg/Graduate School | eng |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborgs universitet/Graduate School | swe |
dc.type.degree | Master 2-years | |