Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSvensson, Lotten
dc.contributor.authorvon Nordenskjöld, Catharina
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-01T12:27:08Z
dc.date.available2020-07-01T12:27:08Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/65403
dc.descriptionMSc in Accounting and Financial Managementsv
dc.description.abstractWe have performed a single case study of the public consultation process of an accounting standard with major financial implications, making it prone to induce intense lobbying. We studied the ability of the standard setting board, the IASB, to remain independent, i.e. not unduly affected, by either a stakeholder group or a certain type of comment. Our findings do not suggest any disproportionate stakeholder influence, nor any disproportionate favoring of a certain type of argument. This predominantly is aligned with previous literature.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMaster Degree Projectsv
dc.relation.ispartofseries2020:44sv
dc.subjectInfluencesv
dc.subjectIFRS 16sv
dc.subjectAccounting regulationsv
dc.subjectAccounting standardsv
dc.subjectIFRSsv
dc.subjectIASBsv
dc.subjectCIGsv
dc.titleTHE POLITICAL PROCESS OF STANDARD-SETTING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FINAL STANDARD - An examination of stakeholder influence in the due process of IFRS 16 Leasessv
dc.typeText
dc.setspec.uppsokSocialBehaviourLaw
dc.type.uppsokH2
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Gothenburg/Graduate Schooleng
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborgs universitet/Graduate Schoolswe
dc.type.degreeMaster 2-years


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record