dc.contributor.author | Rafailidis, Panagiotis | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-17T10:12:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-17T10:12:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-11-17 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/66985 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The purpose of this study is firstly to explore how the users of Stack Overflow, an
online community-based Question and Answer platform, inquire for information
through the formulation of a question, according to the community guidelines.
Secondly, to observe the information exchange procedure between the question and
the comment section. Finally, to investigate, if this volunteered informal learning and
information exchange environment shares any similarities to the Communities of
Practice.
Theory: An emphasis was put to analyse situated learning and Communities of Practice as
described by Wenger (1998) as well as additional research dedicated to this particular
field. Additionally, previous researches were analysed to observe the important
characteristics regarding the question formulation and information exchange
(suggestive solutions).
Method: Two different mixed method content analysis were executed. Firstly, to define the
patterns that entwine questions in the platform and observe the importance of the
community’s guidelines. Secondly, another mixed content analysis to observe the
interaction between the asker and other users in the comment section. The data was
gathered as part of a research project between the Faculty of Education and the
Faculty of Applied Information Technology (IT) within the University of Gothenburg.
Results: The first part of the analysis showed that the community guidelines are the epitome
for a successful question in the community. Even though users are willing to aid new
user with ill-informed questions, there is a connection between the question’s score
and asker’s reputation. As thus, users with longer expertise in the platform are
generally able to create successful questions. The users of the platform are utilizing
the comment section as a troubleshoot chat; aiding the user not only by providing
suggestive solution but by reformulating their question for future use by other users.
Users of the platform edit and provide external resources to learning material to aid
askers that are still learning how to code. It was evident that they do not recognise the
platform as a hand-out solution site but as a community willing to aid users that are
willing to learn. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | VT20-2920-007-PDA699 | sv |
dc.subject | Stack Overflow | sv |
dc.subject | Communities of Practice | sv |
dc.subject | question | sv |
dc.subject | comments | sv |
dc.subject | , information exchange | sv |
dc.subject | CQA | sv |
dc.title | INFORMATION EXCHANGE IN COMMUNITY QUESTION AND ANSWER SITES | sv |
dc.title.alternative | An empirical study of Stack Overflow as Community of Practice | sv |
dc.type | Text | eng |
dc.setspec.uppsok | SocialBehaviourLaw | |
dc.type.uppsok | H2 | |
dc.contributor.department | University of Gothenburg/Department of education, communication and learning | eng |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborgs universitet/Institutionen för pedagogik, kommunikation och lärande | swe |
dc.type.degree | Student essay | eng |