dc.contributor.author | Camoglio, Nicola | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-16T09:41:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-16T09:41:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-02-16 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/67720 | |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, the academic field of adaptation studies has started questioning the fidelityled
approach to adaptation that was long its guiding principle. This essay builds upon this
novel approach by focusing on the conflictual relationship between Stephen King’s novel The
Shining (1977) and the film version (1980) directed by Stanley Kubrick. This comparative
study shows the ways in which Kubrick’s film transcends its source material to establish itself
as a unique piece of art, not beholden to standards of fidelity in order to succeed. The focus of
the argument is on the central themes of the novel and the film, aspects of metafiction and
postmodernism, and Kubrick’s deployment of Freud’s ideas about the uncanny. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | kandidatuppsats engelska | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | SPL 2020-060 | sv |
dc.subject | The Shining | sv |
dc.subject | Stanley Kubrick | sv |
dc.subject | Stephen King | sv |
dc.subject | metafiction | sv |
dc.title | THE SHINING: A SEPARATION A Fundamental Flaw in Adaptation Studies | sv |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.setspec.uppsok | HumanitiesTheology | |
dc.type.uppsok | M2 | |
dc.contributor.department | University of Gothenburg/Department of Languages and Literatures | eng |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborgs universitet/Institutionen för språk och litteraturer | swe |
dc.type.degree | Student essay | |