Assembling the Historic Environment: Heritage in the Digital Making
Abstract
The historic environment is a formulation of the cultural past as experienced and documented in space. Traditional approaches to the historic environment tend to favour conservational and preservational paradigms, such as heritage stewardship or the dynamics of cultural resource management in relation to national policies. Alternatively, they often enquire into the entertainment and time travel approaches of contemporary museum and tourism sectors. Instead, this study will focus on digitality, as both an epistemology and as a means of transmission for assemblages and spaces in the historic environment.
This approach is framed around a comparative study between UK and Swedish approaches to virtual heritage, including immersive technologies and XR (extended reality environments), and the digitised approaches to site and monument inventory, borne out the nineteenth century state-led interest in the preservation of cultural traditions within the public sphere. In doing so, I identify the recurring themes enrolled in processes surrounding digital creation and transmission of historic environment material. Often, this is manifested in the politics of representation and identity, as well as the dynamics of accessibility. Audience matters are crucial to both approaches, but in this thesis, I argue that broad understandings of usership are not fully understood and that the benefits of interdisciplinary humanistic approaches to the historic environment are not being sought. The argument being that simply making a tool or product accessible is not the same as making it egalitarian, nor easily useable or meaningful. It is found that the risk is often run of creating products whereby the audience is broadly the same in terms of culture or profession to that of the product creators.
Many of the root issues, in particular those regarding diversity, are established in the current definitions of what the historic environment is as a physical entity embedded in the cultural landscape. These definitions are described within and expanded upon through proliferation of social and spatial theories to proffer a less tangible definition of the historic environment as a social space in its own right. By removing the physical boundaries of landscape, the goal is to re-establish a historic environment without the limitations of authorised vocabularies, narratives, or terms of authenticity, that shackle the historic environment to local or national government institutions. This in turn allows for a more socially defined, participatory, and holistic approach, returning the historic environment to a cultural realm defined by the lived experience of the contemporary public.
Parts of work
Illsley WR (2019) Problematising the Historic Environment Record: Comments on persistent issues in England and Sweden. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 21(2): 113-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2019.1638082 lllsley WR (2020) Göteborgs Födelse (The Birth of Gothenburg). Permanent Exhibition, Gothenburg City Museum, Gothenburg, Sweden. Nordic Museology 28(1): 120-126. https://doi.org/10.5617/nm.7988 Illsley WR (2021) Digital Surrogacy: Politics and Aesthetics in Visualising the Historical Past of a City. International Journal of Heritage Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.1977373
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
University
Göteborgs universitet. Humanistiska fakulteten
University of Gothenburg. Faculty of Humanities
Institution
Department of Literature, History of Ideas, and Religion ; Institutionen för litteratur, idéhistoria och religion
Disputation
Fredagen den 25 mars 2022, kl 14:00, sal J222, Humanisten
Date of defence
2022-03-25
william.illsley@lir.gu.se
william.illsley@snd.gu.se
Date
2022-03-02Author
Illsley, William R.
Keywords
historic environment
critical heritage studies
authorised heritage
heritage politics
digitality
Publication type
Doctoral thesis
ISBN
978-91-89284-04-3
Language
eng