• English
    • svenska
  • svenska 
    • English
    • svenska
  • Logga in
Redigera dokument 
  •   Startsida
  • Faculty of Social Science / Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten
  • Department of Political Science / Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
  • Working Papers/Books /Department of Political Science / Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
  • Redigera dokument
  •   Startsida
  • Faculty of Social Science / Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten
  • Department of Political Science / Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
  • Working Papers/Books /Department of Political Science / Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
  • Redigera dokument
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Regimes In the World (RIW): A Robust Regime Type Measure based on V-Dem

Sammanfattning
Classifying political regimes has never been as difficult as in this day and age. Most regimes in the world now hold de-jure multiparty elections with universal suffrage. Yet, in some countries these elections ensure that political rulers are – at least somewhat – accountable to the electorate whereas in others they are a mere window dressing exercise for authoritarian politics. Hence, regime types need to be distinguished based on the de-facto implementation of democratic rules. To this end, researchers increasingly turn to expert-coded data sets such as the new Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) dataset. Using V-Dem data, we propose an operationalization of four important regime types – closed and electoral autocracies; electoral and liberal democracies – with vast coverage (almost all countries form 1900 to 2016) and precision. Our new Regimes in the World (RIW) measure includes uncertainty estimates to identify countries in the grey zone between regime types and account for inter-coder disagreement. In cases of disagreement with other datasets (7-12% of the cases), we classify regimes with severe electoral manipulation and infringements of the political freedoms more frequently as electoral autocracies than other datasets, which suggests that our measure captures the opaqueness of contemporary autocracies better.
URL:
http://hdl.handle.net/2077/52481
Samlingar
  • Working Papers/Books /Department of Political Science / Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
Fil(er)
gupea_2077_52481_1.pdf (3.690Mb)
Datum
2017
Författare
Lührmann, Anna
Lindberg, Staffan I.
Tannenberg, Marcus
Serie/rapportnr.
Working Papers
2017:47
Språk
eng
Metadata
Visa fullständig post

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
gup@ub.gu.se | Teknisk hjälp
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Visa

VisaSamlingarI datumordningFörfattareTitlarNyckelordDenna samlingI datumordningFörfattareTitlarNyckelord

Mitt konto

Logga inRegistrera dig

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
gup@ub.gu.se | Teknisk hjälp
Theme by 
Atmire NV