dc.contributor.author | Boberg, Jens | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-28T06:49:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-28T06:49:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-07-28 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/53155 | |
dc.description.abstract | The theory of finance imperialism, according to common interpretations of Hobson and
Lenin, posits that investments in formal empires should yield higher returns than
investments in the imperial metropolis and foreign countries. The aim of this study is to
test this theory on British India in the era of modern imperialism, by comparing British
Indian profits to estimates of returns in the U.K. and other parts of the world. A total
returns index is constructed, based on data from Global Financial Data and the
Investor's Monthly Manual. A guide for interpreting and using these resources is
outlined. Findings indicate that a strict interpretation of finance imperialism does not
explain British presence in India well, unless bias against industrial investments on
behalf of British finance is taken into account. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Magisteruppsats i ekonomisk historia | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2017/03 | sv |
dc.subject | finance imperialism | sv |
dc.subject | investments | sv |
dc.subject | British India | sv |
dc.title | Finance Imperialism in British India - Profits from Indian equity on the London Stock Exchange 1900-1930 | sv |
dc.type | text | |