The percutaneous implant. The effects of design, host site and surgery on the tissue response
Abstract
This research project focuses on the multiple challenges associated with implants that breach the skin. The role of device design, host site, and surgical approach on tissue response and outcome are evaluated, experimentally and clinically, for both a stoma port and a bone-anchored hearing system (BAHS). Experimental studies implied the opportunity to integrate a soft-tissue-anchored titanium port with skin and intestine. However, the longevity was challenged by the presence of bacteria and mechanical strains [Paper I, II]. Applying a micro- and nanotopography to a bone-anchored implant, enhanced its biomechanical anchorage in comparison with a machined surface. Further it was found that removal torque was associated with the degree of bone-to-implant contact, whereas the implant stability, at retrieval, was correlated with the bone area [Paper III]. Bench tests demonstrated that during osteotomy preparation, the level and distribution of heat is affected by the drill design, and the drilling and irrigation procedure. Provided that the recommended, standard procedure is followed, the absolute temperatures using either a conventional drill system or a guided drill system are below the threshold for thermally induced tissue damage [Paper IV]. In human studies of BAHS, anaerobic bacteria, but not aerobes, were detected in the tissue already prior to installation. In contrast, after the installation of BAHS, both anaerobic and aerobic (predominantly S. epidermidis and S. aureus) bacteria were detected on the abutment, in the tissue and in the peri-abutment fluid space, at both three and 12 months [Paper V]. The feasibility of a novel, minimally invasive technique for installing BAHS was demonstrated clinically [Paper VI, VII, VIII]. In a randomized clinical trial, skin sensibility and cosmetics were significantly better and, surgery time and skin sagging was significantly reduced compared with the conventional surgical procedure. At three-months, no significant difference in incidence of inflammation was found between the techniques [Paper VIII].
It is concluded that the device design, host site, and surgical approach are important determinants for the tissue response and clinical outcome of percutaneous systems.
Parts of work
I. Johansson ML, Thomsen P, Hultén L, Halvorsen PS, Fosse E, Edwin B. Integration between a percutaneous implant and the porcine small bowel. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2011;98(1):101-9.
::doi::10.1002/jbm.b.31838 II. Johansson ML, Hultén L, Peeker R, Jonson O, Thomsen P, Edwin B. Achieving stoma continence with an ileal pouch and a percutaneous implant. In manuscript III. Shah FA, Johansson ML, Omar O, Simonsson H, Palmquist A, Thomsen P. Laser-Modified Surface Enhances Osseointegration and Biomechanical Anchorage of Commercially Pure Titanium Implants for Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157504.
::doi::10.1371/journal.pone.0157504 IV. Johansson ML, Eriksson, T, Omar O. The development and ex vivo evaluation of a novel drill system for bone conduction hearing implants. In manuscript. V. Trobos M, Johansson ML, Jonhede S, Simonsson H, Hoffman M, Omar O, Thomsen P, Hultcrantz M. The clinical outcome and microbiological profile of bone anchored hearing systems (BAHS) with different abutment topographies – A prospective pilot study Submitted for publication. VI. Johansson ML, Stokroos RJ, Banga R, Hol MK, Mylanus EA, Savage Jones H, Tysome JR, Vannucchi P, Hof JR, Brunings JW, van Tongeren J, Lutgert RW, Banerjee A, Windfuhr JP, Caruso A, Giannuzzi AL, Bordin S, Hanif J, Schart-Morén N, Singam S, Jonhede S, Holmberg M, Cremers CW, Hultcrantz M. Short-term results from seventy-six patients receiving a bone-anchored hearing implant installed with a novel minimally invasive surgery technique. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2017;42(5):1043-1048.
::doi::10.1111/coa.12803 VII. Calon TG, van Hoof M, van den Berge H, de Bruijn AJ, van Tongeren J, Hof JR, Brunings JW, Jonhede S, Anteunis LJ, Janssen M, Joore MA, Holmberg M, Johansson ML, Stokroos RJ. Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):540.
::doi::10.1186/s13063-016-1662-0 VIII. Calon TGA, Johansson ML, de Bruijn AJG, van den Berge H, Wagenaar M, Eichorn E, Janssen AML, Hof JR, Brunings JW, Joore MA, van Tongeren J, Jonhede S, Holmberg M, Stokroos RJ. Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery versus the Linear incision technique with soft tissue preservation for Bone Conduction Hearing Implants: A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Otology & Neurotology. Accepted for publication. 2017.
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy (Medicine)
University
University of Gothenburg. Sahlgrenska Academy
Institution
Institute of Clinical Sciences. Department of Biomaterials
Disputation
Fredag 9 Mars 2018, kl. 9.00, Föreläsningssal, Biotech Center, Arvid Wallgrens Backe 20, Göteborg
Date of defence
2018-03-09
mlj@stendalen.eu
martin.johansson@biomaterials.gu.se
Date
2018-02-14Author
Johansson, Martin L
Keywords
abutment
bacteria
BAHA
BAHS
biomaterial
bone
bone anchored hearing
bone drilling
drill design
drill mechanics
drilling temperature
enterostoma
flapless
guided surgery
hearing loss
heat generation
ileostomy
implant
infection
inflammation
minimally invasive surgery
MIPS
osteotomy
osseointegration
percutaneous
skin
soft tissue
surgery
titanium
tissue response
urostomy
Publication type
Doctoral thesis
ISBN
978-91-629-0452-4 (PRINT)
978-91-629-0453-1 (PDF)
Language
eng