Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBuchholz, Margret
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-13T08:32:21Z
dc.date.available2018-12-13T08:32:21Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-13
dc.identifier.isbn978-91-7833-250-2 (PDF)
dc.identifier.isbn978-91-7833-249-6 (PRINT)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/57718
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Being able to use remote communication through digital channels is a prerequisite for participation in contemporary society, but some people have difficulties in accessing it. Aim: The overall aim was to explore and describe remote communication for people with communicative and cognitive disabilities. This thesis explored remote communication in relation to self-determination and participation from users’, professionals’ and support persons’ perspectives. Methods: This thesis is based on four studies: three qualitative (I, III, IV) and a mixed method (II). For study I, semi-structured interviews were used, and they were analysed by content analysis. In study II, semi-structured interviews were combined with Talking Mats, a pictorial communication tool, where qualitative data for systematic text condensation and ordinal scale data were obtained. Study III and IV’s focus groups were analysed by focus group analysis. Results: In study I, professionals described how text messaging with both pictures and speech could increase independence and participation, and how individual assessments and user-friendly technology were important. For study II, people with communicative and cognitive disabilities described how remote communication related to self-determination. Having a choice between types of remote communication and levels of independence was important, and technological limitations forced them to find their own strategies to communicate. Support persons discussed how remote communication enabled users to have more control and feel safer while increasing self-determination and participation for study III. The results suggest communicative rights were not met, and there was a need for better provisions of technology and support. In the final study, support persons discussed what enhanced and hindered remote communication. Conclusion: This thesis contributes to the understanding of how people with communication difficulties need access to remote communication to have control, be self-determined and participate in society. It provides knowledge on the needed improvements for access, support and development to improve remote communication use.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.haspartI. Buchholz M, Mattsson Müller I, Ferm U. Text messaging with pictures and speech synthesis for adolescents and adults with cognitive and communicative disabilities – professionals’ views about user satisfaction and participation. Technology and Disability 2013; 25: 87-98. ::doi::10.3233/TAD-130370sv
dc.relation.haspartII. Buchholz M, Ferm U, Holmgren K. “That is how I speak nowadays” – experiences of remote communication among persons with communicative and cognitive disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation 2018; 40:12 1468-79. ::doi::10.1080/09638288.2017.1300340sv
dc.relation.haspartIII. Buchholz M, Ferm U, Holmgren K. Support persons’ views on remote communication and social media for people with communicative and cognitive disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2018: 1-9. ::doi::10.1080/09638288.2018.1529827sv
dc.relation.haspartIV. Buchholz M, Holmgren K, Ferm U. Remote Communication for People with Disabilities: Benefits, Challenges and Suggestions for Technology Development. In manuscript.sv
dc.subjectaugmentative and alternative communicationsv
dc.subjectassistive technologysv
dc.subjectremote communicationsv
dc.subjectdigital communicationsv
dc.subjectself-determinationsv
dc.subjectparticipationsv
dc.subjectqualitativesv
dc.subjectTalking Matssv
dc.subjectsupport personssv
dc.subjectcognitive and communication disabilitiessv
dc.titleLet’s stay in touch! Remote communication for people with communicative and cognitive disabilitiessv
dc.typetexteng
dc.type.svepDoctoral thesiseng
dc.gup.mailmargret.buchholz@vgregion.sesv
dc.type.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (Medicine)sv
dc.gup.originUniversity of Gothenburg. Sahlgrenska Academysv
dc.gup.departmentInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology. Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitationsv
dc.gup.defenceplaceFredagen den 18 januari 2009, kl. 9.00, R-aulan, R-huset, Mölndals sjukhus, Länsmansgatan 28, Mölndalsv
dc.gup.defencedate2019-01-18
dc.gup.dissdb-fakultetSA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record