Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGunnarsson, Tim-Kristoffer
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-11T13:00:12Z
dc.date.available2020-11-11T13:00:12Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/66957
dc.description.abstractThis essay aims to analyse how different archaeologists interpret archaeological remains as ritualistic. It compares different definitions of rituality in archaeology as well as Catherine Bells definition of ritualisation and applies those definitions to select archaeological material, namely Neolithic bog finds, from the Swedish counties of Västra Götaland, Halland and Skåne. The conclusion of the essay is that the ritual definitions posted by the archaeologists Per Karsten and Åsa Berggren is illsuited to analyse the archaeological material in this essay, but that the definitions have a common concept of rituality.sv
dc.language.isoswesv
dc.subjectritualitysv
dc.subjectNeolithicsv
dc.subjectCatherine Bellsv
dc.subjectVästra Götalandsv
dc.subjectHallandsv
dc.subjectSkånesv
dc.subjectbog findssv
dc.subjectarchaeologysv
dc.subjecthuman remainssv
dc.subjectPer Karstensv
dc.subjectÅsa Berggrensv
dc.titleHur vi tolkar ritual - om tolkningen av arkeologiskt material som ritualiseratsv
dc.typeText
dc.setspec.uppsokHumanitiesTheology
dc.type.uppsokM2
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Gothenburg / Department of Historical Studieseng
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborgs universitet / Institutionen för historiska studiersve
dc.type.degreeStudent essay


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record