dc.contributor.author | Landström, Björn | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-13T11:34:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-03-13T11:34:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-03-13 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-91-628-8402-4 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/28252 | |
dc.description.abstract | The skilful general practitioner – ideals challenged by practice
Background and aim: The world organization for general practitioners, Wonca, has formulated
research based core competencies for general practice. However the real performances of GPs are not
much studied in practice. The aim of the first three studies was to investigate and describe the working
behaviour of competent general practitioners from the background of the literature of the field, and to
compare their working behaviour with the Wonca core competencies. The aim of the fourth study was
to investigate medical students´ views of general practice and to find out if there were certain views
associated with regarding general practice as a possible career choice.
Method: The thesis is based on three qualitative studies and one quantitative. In paper 1 data was
gathered by participant observation and interviews with GPs. In paper 2 data was collected by group
interviews. In paper 3 data was collected from reflective writing by final-year medical students. In
paper 4 data was gathered from a questionnaire among medical students. Data was analyzed using text
condensation (paper 1), qualitative content analysis (paper 2 and 3) and statistical descriptions and
comparisons (paper 4).
Findings: Paper 1: Two main categories, dimensions of competence, were constructed: “deliberate
strategies” and “personal style”. Common denominators of the overall working behaviour were
attention to the patient as a person, practicing patient-centred medicine, saving the consultations from
disturbances, rejecting taking over responsibilities from the patients and safeguarding own autonomy.
A well-developed personal style is necessary to obtain the spontaneous interchange between attentive
listening and detachment characteristic to patient-centredness.
Paper 2: Two main categories reflected the competence: “professional readiness” and “working
behaviour”. Professional readiness comprises the inclination of understanding and acting based on the
subcategories: medical knowledge modified by experience, knowing the patient, involvement and
uncertainty. Working behaviour describes in a more concrete way the doctoring approach and is
formed by the subcategories: preparation, the current problem, body attention, cooperation with other
professionals, use of time and taking notes as a work aid.
Paper 3: Three themes were identified to explain the conditions of a general practitioner (GP). They
were: “prerequisites”, “patients’ problems” and “clinical judgment” which reflect the specific features
of primary care, of the presentation of symptoms by patients and of the way that GPs approach an
actual encounter. The students regarded the importance of unselected patient problems,
straightforwardness in contact and care as being the characteristics of a competent GP.
Paper 4: The medical students regarded general practice positively. They found work environment
good, to be aware of patients living conditions as necessary and that GP work requires medical breadth.
A statistical association was found between stated intentions to work as a GP in the future with
statements about general practice offering good work environment and proposing a major share of
general practice in undergraduate training. Students negative to working as a GP were also negative to
a major share of general practice in undergraduate training.
Conclusion: The skilful GP: “Through patient continuity and holism the GP can offer patients
attention in the encounters, closeness to care and clinical breadth. The GP is capable of patientcentredness
and bodily empathy, being aware of uncertainty and is protecting own autonomy. All the
aspects of competence are integrated into the personal style of the GP”. Our studies provided reality for
four out of six Wonca core competencies: commitment to what is most important for the patient,
preparedness for the unexpected in body examination, seeing the human and the breadth of any clinical
situation. | sv |
dc.language.iso | swe | sv |
dc.relation.haspart | 1. Landström B, Rudebeck CE, Mattsson B. Working behaviour of competent
general practitioners – personal styles and deliberate strategies. Scand J Prim
Health Care 2006; 24: 122-128. ::doi::10.1080/02813430500508355 | sv |
dc.relation.haspart | 2. Landström B, Mattsson B, Rudebeck CE. Attributes of competence – on
GP’s work performance in daily practice. Scand J Publ Health 2009; 37(6):
598-603.
::doi::10.1177/1403494809105433 | sv |
dc.relation.haspart | 3. Landström B, Mattsson B, Rudebeck CE. A qualitative study of final-year
medical students’ perspectives of general practitioners’ competencies. Int J
Med Educ 2011; 2: 102-109.
::doi::10.5116/ijme.4e79.b49a | sv |
dc.relation.haspart | 4. Landström B, Mattsson B, Nordin P, Rudebeck CE. Characteristics of
general practice and attractiveness of working as a GP – medical students’
views. 2012.
Submitted: February 27, 2013; Accepted: February 26, 2014; Published: March 15, 2014
::doi::10.5116/ijme.530e.3e4e | sv |
dc.subject | general practitioner | sv |
dc.subject | participant observation | sv |
dc.subject | consultation | sv |
dc.subject | personal style | sv |
dc.subject | patient-centredness | sv |
dc.subject | competence | sv |
dc.subject | medical students | sv |
dc.subject | reflective writing | sv |
dc.subject | Wonca | sv |
dc.subject | work performance | sv |
dc.title | Den kompetenta allmänläkaren - mottagningsrummets praxis utmanar idealbilden | sv |
dc.type | text | eng |
dc.type.svep | Doctoral thesis | eng |
dc.gup.mail | bjorn.landstrom@vgregion.se | sv |
dc.type.degree | Doctor of Philosophy (Medicine) | sv |
dc.gup.origin | University of Gothenburg. Sahlgrenska Academy | sv |
dc.gup.department | Institute of Medicine. Department of Public Health and Community Medicine | sv |
dc.gup.defenceplace | Fredagen den 30 mars 2012, kl 13.00, hörsal 2119, hus 2, Arvid Wallgrens Backe | sv |
dc.gup.defencedate | 2012-03-30 | |
dc.gup.dissdb-fakultet | SA | |