Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohansson, Martin L
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-14T09:14:08Z
dc.date.available2018-02-14T09:14:08Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-14
dc.identifier.isbn978-91-629-0452-4 (PRINT)
dc.identifier.isbn978-91-629-0453-1 (PDF)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/55450
dc.description.abstractThis research project focuses on the multiple challenges associated with implants that breach the skin. The role of device design, host site, and surgical approach on tissue response and outcome are evaluated, experimentally and clinically, for both a stoma port and a bone-anchored hearing system (BAHS). Experimental studies implied the opportunity to integrate a soft-tissue-anchored titanium port with skin and intestine. However, the longevity was challenged by the presence of bacteria and mechanical strains [Paper I, II]. Applying a micro- and nanotopography to a bone-anchored implant, enhanced its biomechanical anchorage in comparison with a machined surface. Further it was found that removal torque was associated with the degree of bone-to-implant contact, whereas the implant stability, at retrieval, was correlated with the bone area [Paper III]. Bench tests demonstrated that during osteotomy preparation, the level and distribution of heat is affected by the drill design, and the drilling and irrigation procedure. Provided that the recommended, standard procedure is followed, the absolute temperatures using either a conventional drill system or a guided drill system are below the threshold for thermally induced tissue damage [Paper IV]. In human studies of BAHS, anaerobic bacteria, but not aerobes, were detected in the tissue already prior to installation. In contrast, after the installation of BAHS, both anaerobic and aerobic (predominantly S. epidermidis and S. aureus) bacteria were detected on the abutment, in the tissue and in the peri-abutment fluid space, at both three and 12 months [Paper V]. The feasibility of a novel, minimally invasive technique for installing BAHS was demonstrated clinically [Paper VI, VII, VIII]. In a randomized clinical trial, skin sensibility and cosmetics were significantly better and, surgery time and skin sagging was significantly reduced compared with the conventional surgical procedure. At three-months, no significant difference in incidence of inflammation was found between the techniques [Paper VIII]. It is concluded that the device design, host site, and surgical approach are important determinants for the tissue response and clinical outcome of percutaneous systems.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.haspartI. Johansson ML, Thomsen P, Hultén L, Halvorsen PS, Fosse E, Edwin B. Integration between a percutaneous implant and the porcine small bowel. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2011;98(1):101-9. ::doi::10.1002/jbm.b.31838sv
dc.relation.haspartII. Johansson ML, Hultén L, Peeker R, Jonson O, Thomsen P, Edwin B. Achieving stoma continence with an ileal pouch and a percutaneous implant. In manuscriptsv
dc.relation.haspartIII. Shah FA, Johansson ML, Omar O, Simonsson H, Palmquist A, Thomsen P. Laser-Modified Surface Enhances Osseointegration and Biomechanical Anchorage of Commercially Pure Titanium Implants for Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157504. ::doi::10.1371/journal.pone.0157504sv
dc.relation.haspartIV. Johansson ML, Eriksson, T, Omar O. The development and ex vivo evaluation of a novel drill system for bone conduction hearing implants. In manuscript.sv
dc.relation.haspartV. Trobos M, Johansson ML, Jonhede S, Simonsson H, Hoffman M, Omar O, Thomsen P, Hultcrantz M. The clinical outcome and microbiological profile of bone anchored hearing systems (BAHS) with different abutment topographies – A prospective pilot study Submitted for publication.sv
dc.relation.haspartVI. Johansson ML, Stokroos RJ, Banga R, Hol MK, Mylanus EA, Savage Jones H, Tysome JR, Vannucchi P, Hof JR, Brunings JW, van Tongeren J, Lutgert RW, Banerjee A, Windfuhr JP, Caruso A, Giannuzzi AL, Bordin S, Hanif J, Schart-Morén N, Singam S, Jonhede S, Holmberg M, Cremers CW, Hultcrantz M. Short-term results from seventy-six patients receiving a bone-anchored hearing implant installed with a novel minimally invasive surgery technique. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2017;42(5):1043-1048. ::doi::10.1111/coa.12803sv
dc.relation.haspartVII. Calon TG, van Hoof M, van den Berge H, de Bruijn AJ, van Tongeren J, Hof JR, Brunings JW, Jonhede S, Anteunis LJ, Janssen M, Joore MA, Holmberg M, Johansson ML, Stokroos RJ. Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):540. ::doi::10.1186/s13063-016-1662-0sv
dc.relation.haspartVIII. Calon TGA, Johansson ML, de Bruijn AJG, van den Berge H, Wagenaar M, Eichorn E, Janssen AML, Hof JR, Brunings JW, Joore MA, van Tongeren J, Jonhede S, Holmberg M, Stokroos RJ. Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery versus the Linear incision technique with soft tissue preservation for Bone Conduction Hearing Implants: A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Otology & Neurotology. Accepted for publication. 2017.sv
dc.subjectabutmentsv
dc.subjectbacteriasv
dc.subjectBAHAsv
dc.subjectBAHSsv
dc.subjectbiomaterialsv
dc.subjectbonesv
dc.subjectbone anchored hearingsv
dc.subjectbone drillingsv
dc.subjectdrill designsv
dc.subjectdrill mechanicssv
dc.subjectdrilling temperaturesv
dc.subjectenterostomasv
dc.subjectflaplesssv
dc.subjectguided surgerysv
dc.subjecthearing losssv
dc.subjectheat generationsv
dc.subjectileostomysv
dc.subjectimplantsv
dc.subjectinfectionsv
dc.subjectinflammationsv
dc.subjectminimally invasive surgerysv
dc.subjectMIPSsv
dc.subjectosteotomysv
dc.subjectosseointegrationsv
dc.subjectpercutaneoussv
dc.subjectskinsv
dc.subjectsoft tissuesv
dc.subjectsurgerysv
dc.subjecttitaniumsv
dc.subjecttissue responsesv
dc.subjecturostomysv
dc.titleThe percutaneous implant. The effects of design, host site and surgery on the tissue responsesv
dc.typetexteng
dc.type.svepDoctoral thesiseng
dc.gup.mailmlj@stendalen.eusv
dc.gup.mailmartin.johansson@biomaterials.gu.sesv
dc.type.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (Medicine)sv
dc.gup.originUniversity of Gothenburg. Sahlgrenska Academysv
dc.gup.departmentInstitute of Clinical Sciences. Department of Biomaterialssv
dc.gup.defenceplaceFredag 9 Mars 2018, kl. 9.00, Föreläsningssal, Biotech Center, Arvid Wallgrens Backe 20, Göteborgsv
dc.gup.defencedate2018-03-09
dc.gup.dissdb-fakultetSA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record